“If peer review was a drug it would never be allowed on the market.”

1,350 peer reviewed scientific papers that support climate skeptics position link 

Over 1,000 internationally recognized scientists, including Nobel winners, who are climate skeptics link

Peer review, why skepticism is essential. Sound science requires critically testing theories and predictions – including those published in peer-reviewed science journals – against objective evidence.

The lesson to be learned is the liberal media engage in laziness or deliberate misrepresentation when they cherry-pick certain peer-reviewed studies and claim that anybody who questions them is “attacking science,” “attacking scientists,” or being a “denialist.” link

List of scientists, wikipedia, skeptics, think alarm overblown, no consensus etc link

Australian dog sits on the board of seven medical journals and has been asked to peer review scientific papers link 

600 peer reviewed scientific papers confirming solar activity has a major impact on the climate link

Why most published research findings are false link

Review education research. The National Reading Panel found the 10,000 published papers in level 1 research journals weren’t worth the paper they were written on.

Review the research record on eugenics. The climate change hysteria of its time, it ran for 70 years. Thousands of "citations". All came to an instantaneous end when they discovered Auschwitz. 

Review the record on diet science. Truth was bottled up and denied for decades. 

Review Ignatz Semmelweiss. First scientist to discover the germ theory of disease, he had his doctors plunge their arms in chlorine solution. Instantly his baby death rates plunged by 70%. He was ridiculed to death... by leading scientists.